Современные представления о радикальном лечении локализованного рака простаты с использованием робот-ассистированной хирургии

1. Алексеев Б.Я., Матвеев В.Б. Рак предстательной железы. Медикаментозные и аппаратные инновации за последние 10 лет // Материалы 13-го конгр. Рос. об-ва урологов, Москва, 6-8 ноября 2013 г. – М., 2013. – С. 387-391.

2. Колонтарев К.Б., Говоров А.В., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Сравнение результатов выполнения открытой и робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии. Обзор литературы // Урал. мед. журн. – 2012. – Т. 95. – № 3. – С. 66-71.

3. Пушкарь Д.Ю. Роботы в медицине // Вестн. Рос. акад. наук. – 2012. – Т. 82. – № 11. – С. 1-21.

4. Пушкарь Д.Ю., Раснер П.И., Говоров А.В. и др. Лапароскопические робот-ассистированные операции / Материалы 12-го съезда Рос. об-ва урологов, Москва, 18-21 сентября 2012. – М., 2012. – С. 325-327.

5. Alsaid B., Bessede T., Karam I. et al. Coexistence of adrenergic and cholinergic nerves in the inferior hypogastric plexus: anatomical and immunohistochemical study with 3D reconstruction in human male fetus // J. Anatomy. – 2009. – Vol. 214. – P. 645-654.

6. Baader B., Herrmann M. Topography of the pelvic autonomic nervous system and its potentional impact on surgical intervention in the pelvis // Clin. Anat. – 2003. – Vol. 16. – P. 119-130.

7. Baskin L.S., Erol A., Li Y.W., Liu W.H. Anatomy of the neurovascular bundle: is safe mobilization is possible? // J. Urol. – 2000. – Vol. 164. – P. 977- 980.

8. Berry A., Korkes F., Hu J. Landmarks for consistent nerve sparing during robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy // J. Endourol. – 2008. – Vol. 22. – P. 1565-1568.

9. Chabert C.C., Merrilees D., Neill M.G., Eden C.G. Curtain dissection of the lateral prostatic fascia and potency after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a veil of mystery // BJU Int. – 2008. – Vol. 101. – P. 1285-1288.

10. Costello A.J., Brooks M., Cole O.J. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves // BJU Int. – 2004. – Vol. 94. – P. 1071-1076.

11. Costello A.J., Dowdle B.W., Namdarian B. et al. Immunohistochemical study of the cavernous nerves in the periprostatic region // BJU Int. – 2011. – Vol. 107. – P. 1210-1215.

12. Dolscher W., Biesold M., Schmidt F., Stolzenburg J.U. The dispute about the external sphincter and the urogenital diaphragm // J. Urol. – 1999. – Vol. 162. – P. 942-945.

13. Eichelberg C., Erbersdobler A., Michl U. et al. Nerve distribution along the prostatic capsule // Eur. Urol. – 2007. – Vol. 51. – P. 105-110.

14. El-Hakim A., Leung R.A., Tewari A. Robotic prostatectomy: pooled analysis of published literature // Expert review Anticancer Therapy. – 2006. – Vol. 6. – P. 11-20.

15. Ganzer R., Stolzenburg J.U., Wieland W.F., Bründl J. Anatomical study of periprostatic nerve distribution: immunohistochemical differentiation of parasympathetic and sympathetic nerves fibers // Eur. Urol. – 2012. – Vol. 62. – P. 1150-1156.

16. Ganzer R., Blana A., Gaumann A. et al. Topographical anatomy of periprostatic and capsular nerves: quantification and computerized planimetry // Eur. Urol. – 2008. – Vol. 54. – P. 353-361.

17. Graefen M., Walz J., Huland H. Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy // Eur. Urol. – 2006. – Vol. 49. – P. 38-48.

18. Huang A.C., Kowalczyk K.J., Hevelone N.D. et al. The impact of prostate size, median lobe, and prior benign prostatic hyperplasia intervention on robotassisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: technique and outcomes // Eur. Urol. – 2011. – Vol. 59. – P. 235-243.

19. Kaiho Y., Nakagawa H., Saito H. et al. Nerves at the ventral prostatic capsule contribute to erectile function: initial electrophysiological assessment in humans // Eur. Urol. – 2009. – Vol. 55. – P. 148-155.

20. Karam I., Moundouni S., Droupy S. et al. The structure and innervation of the male urethra: histological and immunohistochemical studies with three dimentional reconstruction // J. Anat. – 2005. – Vol. 206. – P. 395-403.

21. Kiyoshima K., Yokomizo A., Yoshida T. et al. Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens // Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. – 2004. – Vol. 34. – P. 463-468.

22. Kowalczyk K.J., Huang A.C., Hevelone N.D. et al. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes // Eur. Urol. – 2011. – Vol. 6. – P. 536-547.

23. Lepor H., Gregerman M., Grosby R. et al. Precise localization of the autonomic nerves from the pelvic plexus to the corpora cavernosa: a detailed anatomical study of the adult male pelvis // J. Urol. – 1985. – Vol. 133. – P. 207-212.

24. Lunacek A., Schwentner C., Fritsch H. et al. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: «curtain dissection» of the neurovascular bundle // BJU Int. – 2005. – Vol. 95. – P. 1226-1231.

25. Menon M., Kaul S., Bhadari A. et al. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a quiestionnare based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques // J. Urol. – 2005. – Vol. 174. – P. 2291-2296.

26. Menon M., Tewari A., Peabody J. et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique // J. Urol. – 2003. – Vol. 169. – P. 2289-2292.

27. Myers R.P. Detrusor apron, associated vascular plexus, and avascular plane: relevance to radical retropubic prostatectomy – anatomic and surgical commentary // Urology. – 2002. – Vol. 59. – P. 472-479.

28. Myers R.P. Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy // Urol. Clin. North Am. – 2001. – Vol. 28. – P. 473-490.

29. Nielsen M.E., Schaeffer E.M., Marschke P., Walsh P.C. High anterior release of the levator fascia improves sexual function following open radical retropubic prostatectomy // J. Urol. – 2008. – Vol. 180. – P. 2557-2564, discussion 64.

30. Poore R.E., McCullough D.L., Jarow J.P. Puboprostatic ligament sparing improves urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a technique to reduce pT2 positive margins // Urology. – 2004. – Vol. 64. – P. 1224-1228.

31. Powell M.S., Li R., Sayeduddin M. et al. Neuroanatomy of the normal prostate // Prostate. – 2005. – Vol. 65. – P. 52-57.

32. Rocco F., Carmignani L., Acquati P. et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy // J. Urol. – 2006. – Vol. 175. – P. 2201-2206.

33. Sakamoto N., Hasegawa Y., Koga H. et al. Presence of the ganglia within the prostatic capsule: ganglion involvement in prostatic cancer // Prostate. – 1999. – Vol. 40. – P. 167-171.

34. Savera A.T., Kaul S., Badani K. et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy with the “Veil of Aprodite” technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing // Eur. Urol. – 2006. – Vol. 49. – P. 1065-1074.

35. Schwalenberg T., Neuhaus J., Liatsikos E. et al. Neuroanatomy of the male pelvis in respect to radical prostatectomy including three-dimensional visualization // BJU Int. – 2010. – Vol. 105. – P. 21.

36. Secin F.P., Bianco F.J. Surgical anatomy of radical prostatectomy: periprostatic fascial anatomy and overview of urinary sphincters // Arch. Esp. Urol. – 2010. – Vol. 64. – P. 255-266.

37. Srivatsava A., Grover S., Sooriakumaran P. et al. Neuroanatomic basis for traction-free-preservation of the neural hammock during athermal robotic radical prostatectomy // Current opinion of Urology. – 2011. – Vol. 21. – P. 49-59.

38. Stelzner F. Disturbances of sexual function following rectal excision and sphincter preserving resection of the rectum // Zentralbl. Chir. – 1977. – Vol. 102. – P. 212-219.

39. Stelzner F., Fritsh H., Fleischhauer K. The surgical anatomy of the genital nerves of the male and their preservation in excision of the rectum // Chirurg. – 1989. – Vol. 60. – P. 228-234.

40. Stolzenburg J.U., Schwalenberg T., Horn L.-C. et al. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatectomy // Eur. Urol. – 2007. – Vol. 51. – P. 629-639.

41. Stolzenburg J.U., Gettmann M.T., Liatsikos E.N. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. – Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2007.

42. Takenaka A., Tewari A.K. Anatomical basis for carrying out a state-of-the-art radical prostatectomy // Int. J. Urology. – 2012. – Vol. 11. – P. 7-19.

43. Takenaka A., Leung R.A., Fujisawa M., Tewari A.K. Anatomy of autonomic nerve component in the male pelvis: the new concept from a perspective for robotic nerve sparing radical prostatectomy // World J. Urology. – 2006. – Vol. 24. – P. 136-143.

44. Takenaka A., Tewari A.K., Leung R.A. et al. Preservation of the puboprostatic collar and puboperineoplasty for early recovery of urinary continence after robotic prostatectomy: anatomic basis and preliminary outcomes // Eur. Urol. – 2007. – Vol. 51. – P. 433-440.

45. Tewari A., Rao S., Martinez-Salamanca J.I. et al. Cancer control and the preservation of neurovascular tissue: how to meet competing goals during robotic radical prostatectomy // BJU Int. – 2008. – Vol. 101. – P. 1013-1018.

46. Tewari A., El-Hakim A., Rao S., Raman J.D. Identification of the retrotrigonal layer as a key anatomical landmark during robotically assisted radical prostatectomy // BJU Int. – 2006. – Vol. 98. – P. 829-832.

47. Tewari A., Takenaka A., Mtui E. et al. The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy // BJU Int. – 2006. – Vol. 98. – P. 314-323.

48. Walsh P.C. Anatomical radical prostatectomy evolution of the surgical technique // J. Urol. – 1998. – Vol. 160. – P. 2418-2424.

49. Walsh P.C., Partin A.W. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy // Wein A.J., Kavoussi L.R., Peters C.A. et al. Campbell-Walsh Urology. - Philadelphia, PA: Elsiever Health Sciences, 2006. – Vol. 3. – P. 2956-2978.

50. Walsh P.C., Donker P.J. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention // J. Urol. – 1982. – Vol. 128. – P. 492-497.

51. Walz J., Burnett A.L., Costello A.J. et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy // Eur. Urol. – 2010. – Vol. 57. – P. 179-192.

52. Yorukoglu K., Tuna B., Kirkali Z. Ganglion cells in the human prostate // Prostate Cancer Prostatic Diseases. – 2000. – Vol. 3. – P. 34-36.

53. Young H.H. The radical cure of cancer of the prostate // Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. – 1937. – Vol. 64. – P. 472-484.

54. Yucel S., Baskin L.S. Neuroanatomy of the male urethra and perineum // BJU Int. – 2003. – Vol. 92. – P. 624-630.

55. Yucel S., Erdogru T., Baykara M. Recent neuroanatomical studies on the neurovascular bundle of the prostate and cavernosal nerves: clinical reflections on radical prostatectomy // Asian J. Androl. – 2005. – Vol. 7. – P. 339-349.