Preview

Tuberculosis and socially significant diseases

Advanced search

Modern aspects of the radical treatment of the prostate cancer using robotic surgery

About the Authors

T. N. Moiseenko
ГКУЗ «Московский городской научно-практический центр борьбы с туберкулезом Департамента здравоохранения города Москвы»; ГБОУ ВПО «Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет им. А.И. Евдокимова» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


A. V. Govorov
ГБОУ ВПО «Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет им. А.И. Евдокимова» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


M. A. Prokopovich
ГБОУ ВПО «Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет им. А.И. Евдокимова» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


D. Y. Pushkar
ГБОУ ВПО «Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет им. А.И. Евдокимова» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


References

1. Алексеев Б.Я., Матвеев В.Б. Рак предстательной железы. Медикаментозные и аппаратные инновации за последние 10 лет // Материалы 13-го конгр. Рос. об-ва урологов, Москва, 6-8 ноября 2013 г. – М., 2013. – С. 387-391.

2. Колонтарев К.Б., Говоров А.В., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Сравнение результатов выполнения открытой и робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии. Обзор литературы // Урал. мед. журн. – 2012. – Т. 95. – № 3. – С. 66-71.

3. Пушкарь Д.Ю. Роботы в медицине // Вестн. Рос. акад. наук. – 2012. – Т. 82. – № 11. – С. 1-21.

4. Пушкарь Д.Ю., Раснер П.И., Говоров А.В. и др. Лапароскопические робот-ассистированные операции / Материалы 12-го съезда Рос. об-ва урологов, Москва, 18-21 сентября 2012. – М., 2012. – С. 325-327.

5. Alsaid B., Bessede T., Karam I. et al. Coexistence of adrenergic and cholinergic nerves in the inferior hypogastric plexus: anatomical and immunohistochemical study with 3D reconstruction in human male fetus // J. Anatomy. – 2009. – Vol. 214. – P. 645-654.

6. Baader B., Herrmann M. Topography of the pelvic autonomic nervous system and its potentional impact on surgical intervention in the pelvis // Clin. Anat. – 2003. – Vol. 16. – P. 119-130.

7. Baskin L.S., Erol A., Li Y.W., Liu W.H. Anatomy of the neurovascular bundle: is safe mobilization is possible? // J. Urol. – 2000. – Vol. 164. – P. 977- 980.

8. Berry A., Korkes F., Hu J. Landmarks for consistent nerve sparing during robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy // J. Endourol. – 2008. – Vol. 22. – P. 1565-1568.

9. Chabert C.C., Merrilees D., Neill M.G., Eden C.G. Curtain dissection of the lateral prostatic fascia and potency after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a veil of mystery // BJU Int. – 2008. – Vol. 101. – P. 1285-1288.

10. Costello A.J., Brooks M., Cole O.J. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves // BJU Int. – 2004. – Vol. 94. – P. 1071-1076.

11. Costello A.J., Dowdle B.W., Namdarian B. et al. Immunohistochemical study of the cavernous nerves in the periprostatic region // BJU Int. – 2011. – Vol. 107. – P. 1210-1215.

12. Dolscher W., Biesold M., Schmidt F., Stolzenburg J.U. The dispute about the external sphincter and the urogenital diaphragm // J. Urol. – 1999. – Vol. 162. – P. 942-945.

13. Eichelberg C., Erbersdobler A., Michl U. et al. Nerve distribution along the prostatic capsule // Eur. Urol. – 2007. – Vol. 51. – P. 105-110.

14. El-Hakim A., Leung R.A., Tewari A. Robotic prostatectomy: pooled analysis of published literature // Expert review Anticancer Therapy. – 2006. – Vol. 6. – P. 11-20.

15. Ganzer R., Stolzenburg J.U., Wieland W.F., Bründl J. Anatomical study of periprostatic nerve distribution: immunohistochemical differentiation of parasympathetic and sympathetic nerves fibers // Eur. Urol. – 2012. – Vol. 62. – P. 1150-1156.

16. Ganzer R., Blana A., Gaumann A. et al. Topographical anatomy of periprostatic and capsular nerves: quantification and computerized planimetry // Eur. Urol. – 2008. – Vol. 54. – P. 353-361.

17. Graefen M., Walz J., Huland H. Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy // Eur. Urol. – 2006. – Vol. 49. – P. 38-48.

18. Huang A.C., Kowalczyk K.J., Hevelone N.D. et al. The impact of prostate size, median lobe, and prior benign prostatic hyperplasia intervention on robotassisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: technique and outcomes // Eur. Urol. – 2011. – Vol. 59. – P. 235-243.

19. Kaiho Y., Nakagawa H., Saito H. et al. Nerves at the ventral prostatic capsule contribute to erectile function: initial electrophysiological assessment in humans // Eur. Urol. – 2009. – Vol. 55. – P. 148-155.

20. Karam I., Moundouni S., Droupy S. et al. The structure and innervation of the male urethra: histological and immunohistochemical studies with three dimentional reconstruction // J. Anat. – 2005. – Vol. 206. – P. 395-403.

21. Kiyoshima K., Yokomizo A., Yoshida T. et al. Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens // Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. – 2004. – Vol. 34. – P. 463-468.

22. Kowalczyk K.J., Huang A.C., Hevelone N.D. et al. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes // Eur. Urol. – 2011. – Vol. 6. – P. 536-547.

23. Lepor H., Gregerman M., Grosby R. et al. Precise localization of the autonomic nerves from the pelvic plexus to the corpora cavernosa: a detailed anatomical study of the adult male pelvis // J. Urol. – 1985. – Vol. 133. – P. 207-212.

24. Lunacek A., Schwentner C., Fritsch H. et al. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: «curtain dissection» of the neurovascular bundle // BJU Int. – 2005. – Vol. 95. – P. 1226-1231.

25. Menon M., Kaul S., Bhadari A. et al. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a quiestionnare based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques // J. Urol. – 2005. – Vol. 174. – P. 2291-2296.

26. Menon M., Tewari A., Peabody J. et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique // J. Urol. – 2003. – Vol. 169. – P. 2289-2292.

27. Myers R.P. Detrusor apron, associated vascular plexus, and avascular plane: relevance to radical retropubic prostatectomy – anatomic and surgical commentary // Urology. – 2002. – Vol. 59. – P. 472-479.

28. Myers R.P. Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy // Urol. Clin. North Am. – 2001. – Vol. 28. – P. 473-490.

29. Nielsen M.E., Schaeffer E.M., Marschke P., Walsh P.C. High anterior release of the levator fascia improves sexual function following open radical retropubic prostatectomy // J. Urol. – 2008. – Vol. 180. – P. 2557-2564, discussion 64.

30. Poore R.E., McCullough D.L., Jarow J.P. Puboprostatic ligament sparing improves urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a technique to reduce pT2 positive margins // Urology. – 2004. – Vol. 64. – P. 1224-1228.

31. Powell M.S., Li R., Sayeduddin M. et al. Neuroanatomy of the normal prostate // Prostate. – 2005. – Vol. 65. – P. 52-57.

32. Rocco F., Carmignani L., Acquati P. et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy // J. Urol. – 2006. – Vol. 175. – P. 2201-2206.

33. Sakamoto N., Hasegawa Y., Koga H. et al. Presence of the ganglia within the prostatic capsule: ganglion involvement in prostatic cancer // Prostate. – 1999. – Vol. 40. – P. 167-171.

34. Savera A.T., Kaul S., Badani K. et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy with the “Veil of Aprodite” technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing // Eur. Urol. – 2006. – Vol. 49. – P. 1065-1074.

35. Schwalenberg T., Neuhaus J., Liatsikos E. et al. Neuroanatomy of the male pelvis in respect to radical prostatectomy including three-dimensional visualization // BJU Int. – 2010. – Vol. 105. – P. 21.

36. Secin F.P., Bianco F.J. Surgical anatomy of radical prostatectomy: periprostatic fascial anatomy and overview of urinary sphincters // Arch. Esp. Urol. – 2010. – Vol. 64. – P. 255-266.

37. Srivatsava A., Grover S., Sooriakumaran P. et al. Neuroanatomic basis for traction-free-preservation of the neural hammock during athermal robotic radical prostatectomy // Current opinion of Urology. – 2011. – Vol. 21. – P. 49-59.

38. Stelzner F. Disturbances of sexual function following rectal excision and sphincter preserving resection of the rectum // Zentralbl. Chir. – 1977. – Vol. 102. – P. 212-219.

39. Stelzner F., Fritsh H., Fleischhauer K. The surgical anatomy of the genital nerves of the male and their preservation in excision of the rectum // Chirurg. – 1989. – Vol. 60. – P. 228-234.

40. Stolzenburg J.U., Schwalenberg T., Horn L.-C. et al. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatectomy // Eur. Urol. – 2007. – Vol. 51. – P. 629-639.

41. Stolzenburg J.U., Gettmann M.T., Liatsikos E.N. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. – Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2007.

42. Takenaka A., Tewari A.K. Anatomical basis for carrying out a state-of-the-art radical prostatectomy // Int. J. Urology. – 2012. – Vol. 11. – P. 7-19.

43. Takenaka A., Leung R.A., Fujisawa M., Tewari A.K. Anatomy of autonomic nerve component in the male pelvis: the new concept from a perspective for robotic nerve sparing radical prostatectomy // World J. Urology. – 2006. – Vol. 24. – P. 136-143.

44. Takenaka A., Tewari A.K., Leung R.A. et al. Preservation of the puboprostatic collar and puboperineoplasty for early recovery of urinary continence after robotic prostatectomy: anatomic basis and preliminary outcomes // Eur. Urol. – 2007. – Vol. 51. – P. 433-440.

45. Tewari A., Rao S., Martinez-Salamanca J.I. et al. Cancer control and the preservation of neurovascular tissue: how to meet competing goals during robotic radical prostatectomy // BJU Int. – 2008. – Vol. 101. – P. 1013-1018.

46. Tewari A., El-Hakim A., Rao S., Raman J.D. Identification of the retrotrigonal layer as a key anatomical landmark during robotically assisted radical prostatectomy // BJU Int. – 2006. – Vol. 98. – P. 829-832.

47. Tewari A., Takenaka A., Mtui E. et al. The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy // BJU Int. – 2006. – Vol. 98. – P. 314-323.

48. Walsh P.C. Anatomical radical prostatectomy evolution of the surgical technique // J. Urol. – 1998. – Vol. 160. – P. 2418-2424.

49. Walsh P.C., Partin A.W. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy // Wein A.J., Kavoussi L.R., Peters C.A. et al. Campbell-Walsh Urology. - Philadelphia, PA: Elsiever Health Sciences, 2006. – Vol. 3. – P. 2956-2978.

50. Walsh P.C., Donker P.J. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention // J. Urol. – 1982. – Vol. 128. – P. 492-497.

51. Walz J., Burnett A.L., Costello A.J. et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy // Eur. Urol. – 2010. – Vol. 57. – P. 179-192.

52. Yorukoglu K., Tuna B., Kirkali Z. Ganglion cells in the human prostate // Prostate Cancer Prostatic Diseases. – 2000. – Vol. 3. – P. 34-36.

53. Young H.H. The radical cure of cancer of the prostate // Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. – 1937. – Vol. 64. – P. 472-484.

54. Yucel S., Baskin L.S. Neuroanatomy of the male urethra and perineum // BJU Int. – 2003. – Vol. 92. – P. 624-630.

55. Yucel S., Erdogru T., Baykara M. Recent neuroanatomical studies on the neurovascular bundle of the prostate and cavernosal nerves: clinical reflections on radical prostatectomy // Asian J. Androl. – 2005. – Vol. 7. – P. 339-349.


Review

For citations:


Moiseenko T.N., Govorov A.V., Prokopovich M.A., Pushkar D.Y. Modern aspects of the radical treatment of the prostate cancer using robotic surgery. Tuberculosis and socially significant diseases. 2014;(3):66-71. (In Russ.)

Views: 30


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2413-0346 (Print)
ISSN 2413-0354 (Online)